|
Robert's Stochastic thoughts
|
||
|
That of which we can not speak clearly
will bite us in the ass if we pass over it in silence.
HOMEFeed Joe and Charlie e-mail me Sexual Addiction Medical Insurance Travel Nursing the JedReport Brad De Long's Semi Daily Journal Atrios Mark Thoma Matthew Yglesias Michael Froomkin Angry Bear Jim Henley Glenn Greenwald A Fistful of Euros Max Sawicky Battle Panda Norwegianity Jon Swift my brother in law formerly meta&meta I Hans Sour Grapes fafblog:glofish central Samantha Burns Econgeek my brother in law Kathy Waldmann My Dad's Photos |
Monday, November 14, 2005
Comments:
"Way back when you and I were young, it was agreed that to beg a question is to make an invalid argument which is vulnerable to that question."
Post a Comment
I'm not sure how old you are, but since 350 B.C., when Aristotle classified it as a material logical fallacy in his book Prior Analytics, begging the question has been a fallacy in deductive reasoning in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises. I suppose that a correct explanation would be too much to expect from a writer whose thoughts are stochastic, i.e., "of, relating to, or characterized by conjecture."
|