Site Meter

Thursday, March 07, 2024

Avatars of the Tortoise II

In "Avatars of the Tortoise" Jorge Luis Borges wrote "There is a concept which corrupts and upsets all others. I refer not to Evil, whose limited realm is that of ethics; I refer to the infinite."

He concluded ""We (the indivisible divinity that works in us) have dreamed the world. We have dreamed it resistant, mysterious, visible, ubiquitous in space and firm in time, but we have allowed slight, and eternal, bits of the irrational to form part of its architecture so as to know that it is false."

I think rather that we have dreamed of infinity which has no necessary role in describing the objective universe which is "resistant, mysterious, visible, ubiquitous in space and firm in time*".

First the currently favored theory is that space is not, at the moment, infinite but rather is a finite hypersphere. There was a possibility that time might end in a singularity as it began, but the current view is that the universe will expand forever. Bummer. I note however that the 2nd law of thermodynamics implies that life will not last forever (asymptotically we will "all" be dead, "we" referring to living things not currently living people). So I claim that there is a T so large that predictions of what happens after T can never be tested (as there will be nothing left that can test predictions.

However it is still arguable (by Blake) that we can find infinity in a grain of sand and eternity in an hour. Indeed when Blake wrote, that was the general view of phyicists (philosophy makes the oddest bedfellows) as time was assumed to be a continuum with infinitely many distinct instants in an hour.

Since then physicists have changed their mind -- the key word above was "distinct" which I will also call "distinguishable" (and I dare the most pedantice pedant (who knows who he is) to challenge my interchanging the two words which consist of different letters).

The current view is that (delta T)(delta E) = h/(4 pi) where delta T is the uncertainty in time of an event, delta E is the uncertainty in energy involved, h is Planck's constant, pi is the ratio of the circumpherance of a circle to it's diameter and damnit you know what 4 means.

delta E must be less that Mc^2 where M is the (believed to be finite) mass of the observable universe. So there is a minimum delta T which I will call littleT. A universe in which time is continuous (and an hour contains an infinity of instants) is observationally equivalent to a universe in which time (from the big bang) is a natural number times littleT. The time from the big bang to T can be modeled as a finite number of discrete steps just as well as it can be modeled as a continuum of real numbers. This means that the question of which if these hypothetical possibilities time really is is a metaphysical question not a scientific question.

Now about that grain of sand. there is another formula

(delta X)(delta P) = h/(4 pi)

X is the location of something, P is its momentum. |P| and therefore delta P is less than or equal to Mc/2 where M is the mass of the observable universe. The 2 appears because total momentum is zero. This means that there is a minimum delta X and a model in which space is a latice consisting of a dimension zero, countable set of separated points is observationally equivalent to the standard model in which space is a 3 dimensional real manifold. Again the question of what space really is is metaphysical not scientific.

Recall that space is generally believed to be finite (currently a finite hypersphere). It is expanding. At T it will be really really big, but still finite. That means the countable subset of the 3 dimensional manifold model implies a finite number of different places. No infinity in the observablee universe let alone in a grain of sand

There are other things than energy, time, space and momentum. I am pretty sure they can be modeled as finite sets too (boy am I leading with my chin there).

I think there is a model with a finite set of times and of places which is observationally equivalent to the standard model and, therefore, just as scientifically valid. except for metaphysics and theology, I think we have no need for infinity. I think it is not avatars of the tortoise all the way down.

*note not ubiquitous in time as there wass a singularity some time ago.

27 comments:

Valentine said...

An excellent blog here. A great read. Thank you for sharing this fascinating info

Lawrence said...

I am so blessed to discover this blog. Great info. A very awesome blog post.

Braelynn said...

This is also a very good post which I really enjoy reading. Do another one man

Thaddeus said...

Thank you for sharing this post. I am really impressed with your writing skills.

Davidson said...

Keep up the good writing. Pretty good posts, I think this is one of the best

스포츠 토토사이트 said...

Thanks for sharing this with so much of detailed information.

gostopsite.com said...

Keep sharing such good stuff

sportstotomen.com said...

Helpful and interesting too.

19guide03.com said...

Youre so right. Im there with you.

edwardsrailcar.com said...

Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read article!

safetotosite said...

it's extremely cool blog. Connecting is exceptionally valuable thing.

casinositenet said...

I finally found great post here. Thanks for the information. Please keep sharing more articles.

casinositekim said...

Always a lot of experience when I surf the internet and this is one of them! I visited the best blog.

mttotosite said...

I check out new stuff post. keep it up. Its greatt

sportstoto365 said...

I want you to thank for your time of this wonderful read!!!

cmriindia said...

Nice post. It’s always interesting to read articles here. you really great

파워볼실시간 said...

Woah! It’s simple article, yet effective. Thanks for this

사설 토토사이트 said...

That was an excellent article. You made some great points.

메이저 토토사이트 said...

I would like to refer to your article on my blog and write it.

온라인카지노사이트 said...

It was a very good post indeed. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it in my lunch time.

슬롯사이트 순위 said...

woooow, amazing blog to read, thanks for sharing, and move on.

토토사이트 모음 said...

You really helped me by writing this article. I like the subject too.

Wesley Conner said...

Fantastic website. A lot of helpful info here. Thanks to the effort you put into this blog

Alondra Landry said...

Extremely pleasant and fascinating post. Continue posting. We're waiting Thanks

Nikolas Nichols said...

Thanks for sharing the informative post. Keep on writing the same way you did here

Khari Gutierrez said...

Thanks for sharing. It is such a very amazing post. Great job you made in this post

Melanie Farrell said...

The website style is perfect; the articles are great. and you are great Thanks