One of my rules is never quarrel with Glenn Greenwald. People who do end up looking stupid, but it doesn't matter because they don't dare look in the mirror. On the other hand, one shouldn't mess the Jon Chait either. So how is this going to work out ?
Greenwald’s penchant for telling bold truths that the corrupted partisans are too blind to see, in a manner that in no way is sanctimonious, is an inspiring example for us all. But he does tend to struggle with other aspects of his job, such as reading comprehension.
Oh yes be still my heart. Is the game on ? Please guys. I know you are busy, but the Republican campaign is just sad and I really need a good flame war.
over in comments, I note that the title should be "NY Times symposium beats a dead straw-man" and that "symposium" is classical Greek for wankfest.
Millenia have passed, but, in the end, we all come together.